Joel H. Rosner

Counsel

P 212.216.1187   F 212.216.8001
1350 Broadway
New York, NY 10018

 
P 212.216.1187   F 212.216.8001   jrosner@tarterkrinsky.com

Joel H. Rosner is a counsel in the Litigation and Reputation Management practice. He regularly represents clients in commercial, intellectual property and defamation litigation in the state and federal courts and in arbitrations. With a strong understanding of his clients’ business needs, he assists in complex litigation matters concerning trademark, copyright and patent rights, contract disputes, fraud and other business torts and employment issues. He also counsels clients with respect to their intellectual property rights and employee benefits.

Prior to joining Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP, Joel was an associate at Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard LLP and an Assistant Corporation Counsel with the New York City Law Department.

Community Involvement
  • Board Member, Rittenhouse Astronomical Society
  • Member, Trident at American InterContinental University Institutional Review Board
Education
  • Columbia University Law School, J.D., 2003
  • Columbia University, Columbia College, B.A., 2000
Admissions
  • New York
  • Pennsylvania 
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania 
Community Involvement
  • Board Member, Rittenhouse Astronomical Society
  • Member, Trident at American InterContinental University Institutional Review Board

What I do when I'm not practicing law:
Astronomy

News

Events

  • Second Circuit Slaps Down Anti-SLAPP Motions as Barred in Federal Court

    In a striking decision issued on July 15, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that motions to dismiss based on state Anti-SLAPP statutes, which require that plaintiffs satisfy a high standard of proof in certain types of defamation cases, cannot be made in federal court because such motions conflict with Rules 12 and 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

  • Second Circuit Enhances Enforcement of Arbitration Subpoenas in Federal Court

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (covering New York, Connecticut and Vermont) has issued an opinion that enhances the effectiveness of arbitration as an alternative to litigation. This ruling makes it easier to use the federal courts to enforce subpoenas issued by arbitration panels.

Education
  • Columbia University Law School, J.D., 2003
  • Columbia University, Columbia College, B.A., 2000
Admissions
  • New York
  • Pennsylvania 
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania 

Joel Rosner

Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. Click here to view.

I agree