Non-compete agreements generally are disfavored in New York, but courts will enforce them if they are reasonable in time, geographic scope and are intended to protect a company's "legitimate protectable interest(s)" as opposed to being simply anti-competitive. One question that has never been clearly answered is whether an employer's termination of an employee "without cause" will render a non-compete agreement unenforceable. In this article, Labor & Employment Chair Laurent Drogin and partner David Kleinmann, who are the co-chairs of the firm’s Restrictive Covenant practice, and Litigation partner Rich Schoenstein explore a significant decision handed down by the appellate court covering Manhattan and the Bronx impacting the enforcement of restrictive covenants. Read more: http://bit.ly/2HIW1m1.
|Drogin, Laurent S. Partner and Chair of Labor and Employment Practice and Co-Chair of Restrictive Covenant Practice||Partner and Chair of Labor and Employment Practice and Co-Chair of Restrictive Covenant Practice||212.216.8016|
|Kleinmann, David N. Partner and Co-Chair of Restrictive Covenant Practice||Partner and Co-Chair of Restrictive Covenant Practice||212.216.1115|
|Schoenstein, Richard C. Partner, Vice-Chair of Litigation and Co-Chair of Securities and Financial Services Litigation Group||Partner, Vice-Chair of Litigation and Co-Chair of Securities and Financial Services Litigation Group||212.216.1120|