Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Tarter website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.
This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy,click here.
Litigation partner Rich Schoenstein authored an article for the New York Law Journal’s special Litigation report titled, "The Workforce Mobility Act: The Wrong Solution For Non-Compete Litigation.” In the article, which appeared online on July 13 and in print on July 16, Rich explores the litigation aspects of restrictive covenants and the potential implications and difficulties of enforcing the proposed Workforce Mobility Act of 2018 (WMA). Rich notes, "While there are valid objections to non-competes restricting low-level employees, the more traditional use of non-competes to protect businesses are still appropriate and should not be eliminated. Moreover, the WMA leaves many open questions that could result in further litigation for years to come.”