Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Tarter website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.
This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy,click here.
Labor and Employment chair Laurent Drogin was quoted in the ENR article, “High Court Takes on LGBTQ Anti-Bias Gaps in US Law.” The article delves into the three consolidated sexual orientation and gender identity workplace bias cases that the U.S. Supreme Court will decide in the new term. These cases will determine banning explicit discrimination against LGBTQ employees in the workplace by adding gender identity and sexual orientation to sex bias already banned under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. This decision may include changing federal law and extending protections nationwide.
Laurent explains, “The failure of Title VII to recognize LGBTQ claims has kept most of the litigation at the state and city level.” He notes, “It is not clear that New Yorkers will obtain more benefits if they can sue under federal law … because remedies under state and local laws are broader.”