Microsoft has discontinued support for Internet Explorer. To access the Tarter website, please install a modern browser like Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome.
This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy,click here.
Four days after an employee joined a competitor, we obtained a temporary restraining order limiting his ability to have certain interactions with clients. Less than one month later, after a two-day preliminary injunction hearing, the court enforced our client’s contract and barred the former employee from soliciting, accepting business from, or servicing key clients for a 24-month period. We conducted a quick forensic analysis to show the Court that the former employee had taken massive amounts of confidential information on a memory stick.
Counseled a high-level executive subject to restrictive covenants who wanted to change employers. His former employer requested a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction pending arbitration, but the court allowed our client to accept business from clients that wanted to work with him. This resulted in a favorable settlement which was timely and cost-effective.
Our client was granted a unique temporary restraining order stopping a former employee, an insurance agent, from working for a direct competitor and advertising his new position on LinkedIn. The court prohibited the employee from working for the competitor based on the employee’s failure to honor the 60-day notice provision, allowing the client to arrange for a smooth transition of business and decrease the likelihood that clients would leave.
We obtained partial summary judgment on behalf of our client, an insurance brokerage resulting in a favorable settlement just before trial. Our contract language was enforced in several critical ways and allowed us to effectively oppose a claim that the covenants were not enforceable because of our client’s claimed breach; holding that the former employee breached our agreement by not giving proper notice at the time he resigned and concluding that a 24-month restriction on an insurance producer’s ability to solicit and accept business from former clients was enforceable.
We obtained a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction for a placement firm, shutting down a group of employees who had established a competing business and used confidential contact information that they had taken with them. Our client was also awarded attorneys’ fees.
Representative Matters
Four days after an employee joined a competitor, we obtained a temporary restraining order limiting his ability to have certain interactions with clients. Less than one month later, after a two-day preliminary injunction hearing, the court enforced our client’s contract and barred the former employee from soliciting, accepting business from, or servicing key clients for a 24-month period. We conducted a quick forensic analysis to show the Court that the former employee had taken massive amounts of confidential information on a memory stick.
Counseled a high-level executive subject to restrictive covenants who wanted to change employers. His former employer requested a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction pending arbitration, but the court allowed our client to accept business from clients that wanted to work with him. This resulted in a favorable settlement which was timely and cost-effective.
Our client was granted a unique temporary restraining order stopping a former employee, an insurance agent, from working for a direct competitor and advertising his new position on LinkedIn. The court prohibited the employee from working for the competitor based on the employee’s failure to honor the 60-day notice provision, allowing the client to arrange for a smooth transition of business and decrease the likelihood that clients would leave.
We obtained partial summary judgment on behalf of our client, an insurance brokerage resulting in a favorable settlement just before trial. Our contract language was enforced in several critical ways and allowed us to effectively oppose a claim that the covenants were not enforceable because of our client’s claimed breach; holding that the former employee breached our agreement by not giving proper notice at the time he resigned and concluding that a 24-month restriction on an insurance producer’s ability to solicit and accept business from former clients was enforceable.
We obtained a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction for a placement firm, shutting down a group of employees who had established a competing business and used confidential contact information that they had taken with them. Our client was also awarded attorneys’ fees.